期刊
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109479
关键词
ADHD; Hyperactivity; Objective assessments; Actigraph; Motion tracking system
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [82071537, 31471084, 81520108016]
- key medical disciplines of Hangzhou
Hyperactivity is one of the core symptoms of ADHD, but objective assessments for hyperactivity are seldom used compared to measures of inattention and impulsivity. Actigraph and QbTest are two devices that can be used to objectively measure hyperactivity, but they have limitations in distinguishing ADHD from other disorders or different types of ADHD.
Hyperactivity is one of the three core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that is a common childhood mental disorder. Objective assessments of hyperactivity are seldom utilized compared with measures of inattention and impulsivity during clinical diagnosis and evaluation. Acceleration-sensitive devices (e.g., Actigraph) and motion tracking systems (e.g., QbTest) are two main groups of devices that can be used to objectively measure hyperactivity. The Actigraph and QbTest have good discriminant validity, convergent validity, and sensitivity to the effects of stimulants. Furthermore, the assessment setting (i.e., research laboratory, school, or home) can greatly influence the presence and severity of hyperactivity. Nevertheless, objective assessments for hyperactivity have poor ability to distinguish ADHD from other disorders, or among the three types of ADHD. Thus, further studies are needed to assess objective measurements of hyperactivity in terms of discriminant and convergent validity, test-retest reliability in different settings, and correlations with brain activity.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据