4.4 Article

Neuroanatomical and neurophysiological evidence of pulmonary nociceptor and carotid chemoreceptor convergence in the nucleus tractus solitarius and nucleus ambiguus

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 6, 页码 1511-1518

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00125.2022

关键词

carotid chemoreceptor; nucleus ambiguus; nucleus tractus solitarius; pulmonary nociceptor; sensory convergence

资金

  1. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI [UL1TR001881a KL2 (UL1TR001881)]
  2. Parker B Francis Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensory convergence of pulmonary vagal nociceptors and carotid chemoreceptors occurs in the nucleus tractus solitarius and nucleus ambiguus, leading to enhanced motor output for airway defense.
Pulmonary vagal nociceptors defend the airways. Cardiopulmonary vagal nociceptors synapse in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). Evidence has demonstrated the convergence of cardiopulmonary nociceptors with afferents from carotid chemoreceptors. Whether sensory convergence occurs in motor nuclei and how sensory convergence affects reflexive efferent motor output directed toward the airways are critical knowledge gaps. Here, we show that distinct tracer injection into the pulmonary nociceptors and carotid chemoreceptors leads to co-labeled neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius and nucleus ambiguus. Precise simultaneous stimulation delivered to pulmonary nociceptors and carotid chemoreceptors doubled efferent vagal output, enhanced phrenic pause, and subsequently augmented phrenic motor activity. These results suggest that multiple afferents are involved in protecting the airways and concurrent stimulation enhances airway defensive reflex output. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensory afferents have been shown to converge onto nucleus tractus solitarius primary neurons. Here, we show sensory convergence of two distinct sets of sensory afferents in motor nuclei of the nucleus ambiguus, which results in augmentation of airway defense motor output.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据