4.4 Article

Percutaneous sclerotherapy of microcystic lymphatic malformations: the use of an innovative gravity-dependent technique

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 272-+

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018526

关键词

Vascular Malformation; Technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gravity-dependent sclerotherapy technique has been found to be a suitable treatment option for microcystic lymphatic malformations, with nearly all cases showing significant improvement and no permanent complications from the treatment.
Background In the last few decades there has been development of innovative therapies for the treatment of craniofacial lymphatic malformations. Percutaneous sclerotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in the management of macrocystic lymphatic lesions, but it is less suitable for microcystic lesions given their size. The gravity-dependent technique is a novel augmentation of standard percutaneous sclerotherapy: the technique enables a sclerosing agent to permeate the small microchannels seen in microcystic lesions that would otherwise be difficult to treat. Methods Between 2005 and 2021, 124 patients with microcystic or mixed lymphatic malformations were treated using a novel gravity-dependent sclerotherapy technique. Bleomycin at a maximum dose of 15 IU per session was used as the main sclerosing agent. Fluoroscopy and ultrasound were used to ensure proper positioning of the catheter prior to injecting the sclerosing agent. The response to treatment was assessed clinically and with cross-sectional imaging. Results Nearly all cases showed significant improvement after the gravity-dependent technique. There have been no permanent complications from sclerotherapy treatment. There was a mild transient adverse effect from bleomycin in one case of erythema and tenderness that lasted several weeks then ameliorated. Conclusions The gravity-dependent sclerotherapy technique is a suitable treatment option for microcystic lymphatic malformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据