4.7 Article

Influence of Er3+ ion concentration on optical and photoluminescence properties of Er3+-doped gadolinium-calcium silica borate glasses

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 683, 期 -, 页码 590-598

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.314

关键词

Er3+ glasses; Optical properties; NIR luminescence; Decay time; Optical amplifiers

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea (MEST) [2015R1A2A1A13001843]
  2. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Er3+-doped gadolinium calcium silica borate glasses of composition (55-x) B2O3 - 10 SiO2 - 25 Gd2O3 - 10 CaO - x Er2O3, where x = 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mol %, have been prepared by conventional melt quenching technique and are characterized through optical absorption, visible and near-infrared (NIR) emission spectra and decay time measurements. Judd-Ofelt (JO) intensity parameters (Omega(lambda), lambda = 2, 4 and 6) have been derived from the absorption spectrum of 0.5 mol % Er2O3 doped glass and in turn are used to calculate radiative properties for the important luminescent levels of Er3+ ions. The studied glasses show intense and broad green (550 nm) and red (591 nm) visible emissions under at 379 nm excitation. Upon excitation at 980 nm laser diode, an intense 1.53 mm NIR emission has been observed with the maximum full width at half maximum (FWHM) and its value is found to be 106 nm for 2.5 mol % Er3+-doped gadolinium calcium silica borate glasses. This broad luminescence locates in the region of 1420-1635 nm and covers the S, C and L bands. The decay curves of the I-4(13/2) level exhibit exponential nature for all the concentrations. The lifetime of the I-4(13/2) level has found to be decrease from 1.46 to 1.35 ms with increase of Er3+ ion concentration. Hence, these results clearly indicate that present glasses are suitable for efficient short and conventional-length optical amplifiers and tunable lasers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据