4.7 Article

Atom probe analysis and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Fe84.3Si4B8P3Cu0.7

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 674, 期 -, 页码 136-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.005

关键词

Atomic scale structure; Magnetisation; Magnetostriction; Nanostructured materials; Rapid-solidification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the microstructure and the magnetic properties of as-cast and flash annealed (4 s at 420 degrees C-560 degrees C) Fe84.3Si4B8P3Cu0.7 melt-spun ribbons. The scanning electron microscopy-electron backscattered diffraction (SEM-EBSD) analyses proved the existence of crystalline layer with the thickness of 1 mu m in the as-cast state on both the wheel-contacted and the free surfaces of ribbons. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns showed that the crystalline surfaces were textured. Moreover, the microstructure, composition and phase evolution of surface crystallization were studied using TEM and 3DAP which the spherulitic microstructure on the surface was demonstrated. Flash annealing above 420 degrees C led to a nanocrystalline microstructure of containing 10-15 nm alpha-Fe (Si) crystallites embedded in a residual amorphous matrix containing Fe, Si, B and P. Three-dimensional atom probe (3DAP) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis revealed that boron and phosphorous were rejected from alpha-Fe (Si) phase and enriched in the residual amorphous phase. The nucleation of the nanocrystals occurs heterogeneously from the 3-5 nm alpha-Fe crystals that were present in the as-cast state. The saturation magnetic induction (B-s) increases from B-s = 1.55 T in the amorphous state to B-s = 1.76 T after the crystallization. The saturation magnetostriction constant, lambda(s), decreased from originally 35 ppm in the as-cast state to about 14 ppm with coercive fields in the range of H-c = 20-30 A/m. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据