4.2 Article

Exploring the molecular interaction of pheniramine with Enterococcus faecalis homoserine kinase: In-silico studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2979

关键词

Enterococcus faecalis; Homoserine Kinase; homology modelling; Multidrug resistant

资金

  1. DST FIST [SR/FST/LS-I/2017/56]
  2. DST PURSE [SR/PURSE/2021/77]
  3. New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infections caused by drug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis are a significant problem in hospitals. This study focuses on a critical protein in the bacteria and found that pheniramine has good binding affinity for it.
Infections caused by the bacteria Enterococcus faecalis (also known as E. faecalis) are common in hospitals. This bacterium is resistant to a wide range of medicines and causes a variety of nosocomial infections. An increase in the number of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is causing substantial economic and health issues around the world. Consequently, new therapeutic techniques to tackle the growing threat of E. faecalis infections must be developed as soon as possible. In this regard, we have targeted a protein that is regarded to be critical for the survival of bacteria in this experiment. Homoserine kinase (HSK) is a threonine metabolism enzyme that belongs to the GHMP kinase superfamily. It is a crucial enzyme in threonine metabolism. This enzyme is responsible for a critical step in the threonine biosynthesis pathway. Given the important function that E. faecalis Homoserine Kinase (ESK) plays in bacterial metabolism, we report here cloning, expression, purification and structural studies of E. faecalis HSK using homology modelling. In addition, we have reported on the model's molecular docking and Molecular Dynamic Stimulation (MD Stimulation) investigations to validate the results of the docking experiments. The results were promising. In silico investigations came up with the conclusion: pheniramine has good binding affinity for the E. faecalis HSK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据