4.4 Article

Discovery of novel targets and mechanisms of MEK inhibitor Selumetinib for LGG treatment based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-022-05132-9

关键词

Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics simulation; Selumetinib; Low-grade glioma; CDK2

资金

  1. Shihezi University high-level talent scientific research startup project [RCZK202047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation to identify a new target CDK2 and mechanism of MEK inhibitor Selumetinib in the treatment of low-grade glioma (LGG), providing theoretical guidance for its clinical medication.
Based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation, to find a new target and mechanism of MEK inhibitor Selumetinib in the treatment of low-grade glioma (LGG), and to provide theoretical guidance for its clinical medication. All possible targets of Selumetinib were fished through the compound target prediction database. New targets of Selumetinib in the treatment of LGG were found and its mechanism was evaluated employing molecular docking, gene difference analysis, molecular dynamics simulation, and protein subcellular localization prediction. A total of 100 Selumetinib targets and 85 LGG-related targets were screened in this study. There were 7 active targets at the intersection of the two. Through protein interaction (PPI), gene enrichment analysis, and gene difference analysis, one effective target of Selumetinib was finally screened, CDK2 mainly existing in the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, and plasma membrane; the target plays a role in the treatment of LGG by inhibiting the signal pathways of PI3K Akt and participating in biological processes such as peptide amino acid modification, regulation of intracellular signal transduction, and positive regulation of cell metabolism. CDK2 may be a new direction of Selumetinib in the clinical treatment of LGG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据