4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution in pulsed laser deposited epitaxial Ge-Sb-Te chalcogenide thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 676, 期 -, 页码 582-590

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.159

关键词

Thin films; Data storage materials; Vapor deposition; Atomic scale structure; Transmission electron microscopy; TEM

资金

  1. European Union
  2. Free State of Saxony (LenA project) [100074065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thin film deposition and structure of highly oriented telluride compounds is of particular interest for phase-change applications in next-generation non-volatile memory such as heterostructure designs, as well as for the investigation of novel optical, thermoelectric and ferroelectric properties in layered telluride compounds. In this work, epitaxial Ge-Sb-Te thin films were successfully produced by pulsed laser deposition on silicon with and without amorphous SiOx interlayer at elevated process temperatures from a Ge2Sb2Te5 target. Aberration-corrected high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging reveals a distinct interface configuration of the trigonal phase connected by a quasi van der Waals gap (vacancy) to the Sb/Te-passivated single crystalline Si substrate, yet also an intermediate textured growth regime in which the substrate symmetry is only weakly coupled to the thin film orientation, as well as strong deviation of composition at high deposition temperatures. Textured growth of Ge-Sb-Te thin film was also observed on SiOx/Si substrate with no evidence of an intermediate Sb/Te surface layer on top of an SiOx layer. In addition, particular defect structures formed by local reorganization of the stacking sequence across the vacancy gap are observed and appear to be intrinsic to these van der Waals-layered compounds. Theoretical image simulations of preferred stacking sequences can be matched to individual building blocks in the Ge-Sb-Te grain. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据