4.7 Article

Mechanistic Insights into the Preference for Tandem Binding Sites in DNA Recognition by FOXM1

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 434, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167426

关键词

FOXM1; tandem DNA site; protein-protein interaction; cooperative DNA recognition; crystal structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570537, 81974074]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M693574]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2021RC2034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that FOXM1 prefers binding tandem DNA sites, and this binding preference may be driven by intermolecular protein-protein interactions.
FOXM1 is an essential proliferation-associated transcription factor that controls the activation of a number of cell cycle regulatory genes. Unlike other forkhead box (FOX) transcription factors, FOXM1 has been shown to prefer binding tandem regulatory DNA sites. However, the underlying reason for such preference is not clear. Here, we showed that the tandem DNA motif, named DIV2, is widely distributed in the promoter region of FOXM1 target genes. The binding of FOXM1 on the DIV2 site differs dramatically from other sites, which is in a highly cooperative fashion, with a much enhanced thermal stability and can be clearly detected by EMSA. The crystal structure of FOXM1 in complex with the DIV2 DNA reveals that the cooperative binding is likely to be driven by intermolecular protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Further half-site spacer insertion assays showed that FOXM1 can bind another site, DIV0, in a similar manner to the DIV2 site. Given the high occurrence of the DIV2 and DIV0 sites in FOXM1 target genes, our results suggest that FOXM1 prefers tandem DNA sites to enable cooperative DNA recognition, and such binding characteristics may further confer its specificity during transcriptional regulation.(c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据