4.7 Article

Mechanisms for enhanced transport selectivity of like-charged ions in hydrophobic-polymer-modified ion-exchange membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 658, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120645

关键词

Ion-exchange membrane; Ion selectivity; Ion dehydration; Hydrophobic polymer; Polypyrrole

资金

  1. George Washington University [UFF FY22]
  2. George Washington University (GW)
  3. University Facilitating Fund of X.L. at GW [UFF FY22]
  4. New Faculty Start-up Funds of M.S. from California State University, Fullerton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that modifying a commercial anion exchange membrane (AEM) with a hydrophobic polymer, polypyrrole (PPy), enhances the transport selectivity of nitrate over chloride and sulfate ions. The improved selectivity is attributed to the decoupling of the ion partition and diffusion within the polymer phase, resulting in enhanced ion transport selectivity between like-charged ions.
Effectively removing contaminants or extracting resources from water necessitates selective separation of ions with toxicity or economic value from common ions. Existing ion exchange membranes (IEM) effectively separate ions with opposite charges, but are not optimized for separating ions of like charges. An understanding of ion separation mechanisms is imperative for developing IEMs with improved selectivity between like-charged ions. In this work, we modify a commercial anion exchange membrane (AEM) with a hydrophobic polymer, polypyrrole (PPy), and show that PPy-modified AEM exhibits enhanced transport selectivity of nitrate over both chloride and sulfate. Combining ion sorption experiments and molecular dynamics simulations, we show that the enhanced selectivity between nitrate and chloride is attributed to the decoupling of the inverse relation between the ion partition into and diffusion within the polymer phase, which improves the overall ion transport selectivity between like-charged ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据