4.7 Article

Membrane adsorber with hierarchically porous HKUST-1 immobilized in membrane pores by flowing synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 650, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120424

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; Membrane adsorber; Flowing synthesis; Hierarchically porous structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808144]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for theCentral Universities [20822041B4013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A membrane adsorber with hierarchically porous HKUST-1 (HP-HKUST-1) immobilized in membrane pores was fabricated using flowing synthesis. The adsorbent showed a high adsorption capacity and a fast adsorption rate, as well as good repeatability.
A membrane adsorber with hierarchically porous HKUST-1 (HP-HKUST-1) immobilized in membrane pores has been fabricated by flowing synthesis. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) characteristics indicate that the structural integrity of the HP-HKUST-1 immobilized in the membrane pores can be kept after template agents are removed. Other characteristics prove the effective immobilization of HP-HKUST-1 in membrane pores. As a concept-of-proof, the adsorption for Congo red (CR) and Methylene blue (MB) is carried out to evaluate the adsorption performance of the membrane adsorber. The adsorption capacity for CR with 458 mg g(-1) and MB with 241 mg g(-1) can be obtained by HP-HKUST-1 powder, which is 2-3 times higher than those by HKUST-1 powder, owing to the mesopores with rich active adsorption sites. When the solution flows through the membrane adsorber, the adsorption rate for these adsorbates in the range of 0.049 g mg(-1) h(-1) and 0.129 g mg(-1) h(-1) can be obtained, which is 4-5 times higher than that by HP-HKUST-1 powder, owing to the enhanced mass transfer in the confined space of the membrane pores with micro or nano scale. After going through seven adsorption-desorption experiments, the membrane adsorber with HP-HKUST-1 immobilized shows remarkable repeatability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据