4.7 Article

Highly Selective SERCA2a Activators: Preclinical Development of a Congeneric Group of First-in-Class Drug Leads against Heart Failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 7324-7333

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00347

关键词

-

资金

  1. CVie Therapeutics Limited (Taipei, Taiwan)
  2. WindTree Therapeutics (Warrington, USA)
  3. University of Milano Bicocca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stimulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase SERCA2a is a promising therapeutic strategy for heart failure. Istaroxime, a compound with dual mechanisms of action, inhibits Na+/K+ ATPase and stimulates SERCA2a. By synthesizing a series of analogues, we identified a compound that lacks Na+/K+ ATPase inhibitory activity but retains SERCA2a stimulatory action. Further studies in isolated cardiomyocytes and a rat model showed that the compound is safe and improves cardiac performance, making it a potential drug candidate for heart failure treatment.
The stimulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase SERCA2a emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy to efficiently improve overall cardiac function in heart failure (HF) with reduced arrhythmogenic risk. Istaroxime is a clinical-phase IIb compound with a double mechanism of action, Na+/K+ ATPase inhibition and SERCA2a stimulation. Starting from the observation that istaroxime metabolite PST3093 does not inhibit Na+/K+ ATPase while stimulates SERCA2a, we synthesized a series of bioisosteric PST3093 analogues devoid of Na+/K+ ATPase inhibitory activity. Most of them retained SERCA2a stimulatory action with nanomolar potency in cardiac preparations from healthy guinea pigs and streptozotocin (STZ)-treated rats. One compound was further characterized in isolated cardiomyocytes, confirming SERCA2a stimulation and in vivo showing a safety profile and improvement of cardiac performance following acute infusion in STZ rats. We identified a new class of selective SERCA2a activators as first-in-class drug candidates for HF treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据