4.6 Article

Domestic microwave supported green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles for electronic, mechano, rheological and frequency intensifying applications

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-08344-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India [MRP 6989/16/ (SERO/UGC)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioactive constituents of ZnO nanoparticles incorporated with Phyllanthus acidus fruit extract were studied for solar cell fabrication using a domestic microwave-assisted green synthesis method. The synthesized ZnO nanoparticles showed a hexagonal and wurtzite crystalline structure with an average particle size of 5.2 nm. The presence of various functional groups provided stability to the nanoparticles. The study also highlighted the applications of ZnO nanoparticles in solar cell fabrication and photovoltaic devices.
Bioactive constituents of ZnO nanoparticles incorporated with Phyllanthus acidus fruit extract is studied for solar cell fabrication by means of domestic microwave-assisted green synthesis method. ZnO nanoparticles are synthesized with an average particle size of 5.2 nm and it possess the hexagonal and wurtzite crystalline structures. An absorption peak at 353 nm validates the formation of Zn nanoparticles and it is the foremost property of ZnO nanoparticles. It is highly reported that the presence of O-H, N-H, C-H, C-O and amine groups provides the stabilization of these nanoparticles. A well aligned concentric rings pattern is mostly seen in the selected area electron diffraction. The ac conductivity, dielectric loss and dielectric constant are also accomplished and shows better cell deficiency. The dc conductivity activation energy is resulted as 0.045 eV. The most important applications of ZnO nanoparticles in solar cell fabrication and photovoltaic devices are also spotlighted. The electronic influx; tribological as well as rheological studies are also performed for P. acidus fruit extract based ZnO nanoparticles for electro-mechano uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据