4.7 Article

Modeling the Performance of the Clock Phase Caching Approach to Clock and Data Recovery

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1681-1689

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3130955

关键词

Clocks; Optical switches; Optical transmitters; Adaptive optics; Optical receivers; Synchronization; Optical network units; Data center networks; optical switching; clock synchronization; clock and data recovery; clock phase caching

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/R041792/1, EP/V051377/1, EP/R035342]
  2. Royal Society Paul Instrument Fund [PIF/R1/180001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the use of clock-synchronized approach in optical switching networks and introduces an analytical model to evaluate the performance and scalability of clock phase caching method. The model is validated using experimental results and provides accurate predictions.
Optical switching could enable data center networks to keep pace with the rapid growth of intra-data center traffic, however, sub-nanosecond clock and data recovery time is crucial to enabling optically-switched data center networks to transport small packet dominated data center traffic with over 90% efficiency. We review the clock-synchronized approach to clock and data recovery, which enables sub-nanosecond switching time in optically switched networks. We then introduce an analytical model to mathematically explore the operation of clock phase caching, and use this model to explore the impact of factors such as fiber temperature, clock jitter and symbol rate on the BER and clock and data recovery locking time performance of the clock phase caching approach, as well as their impact on scalability. Using commercial data center parameters matching those used in our previous experimental research, we find that our analytical model provides estimates that closely match our previous experimental results, validating its use for making predictions of the performance of clock phase cached systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据