4.7 Article

Which wets TiB2 inoculant particles: Al or Al3Ti?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 664, 期 -, 页码 460-468

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.203

关键词

Interfacial energy; Density functional theory; Nucleation; Aluminium; Al3Ti; TiB2

资金

  1. ESPRC [EP/I02249X/1, GR/T26344/1]
  2. ExoMet Project
  3. European Commission [FP7-NMP3-LA-2012- 280421]
  4. European Space Agency
  5. Research Complex at Harwell
  6. Diamonde-Manchester Collaboration and the Research Complex at Harwell
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I02249X/1, GR/T26344/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/I02249X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiB2 particles are proven effective nucleants of commercial purity aluminium, resulting in smaller grains and hence greater desired mechanical properties; however, there is uncertainty as to the mechanism by which it operates. Here we clarify what happens in the initial stages by computing the total Gibbs energy change associated with four possible nucleation mechanisms, each characterised by the termination of the TiB2(0001) substrate (Ti or B) and the solid that forms on it (Al or Al3Ti). The appropriate solid//solid interfacial energies are derived from Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, while the bulk energies are derived from thermodynamic data, supplemented with strain energies calculated from DFT. Solid//liquid interfacial energies are estimated using simple models with parameters based on the literature and DFT calculations. The results suggest that the Ti termination of TiB2 is more stable than the B termination in the melt, and that the direct formation of Al off a Ti-terminated TiB2 substrate is the most favourable mechanism for the nucleation of Al rather than the previously proposed formation of a Al3Ti interlayer. On the B termination of TiB2, Al formation is more stable for thick solid layers, but this is much more uncertain for thin solid layers where it is possible that Al3Ti formation is more stable. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据