4.1 Article

Inclusion body myositis and dysphagia. Presentation, intervention and outcome at a swallowing clinic

期刊

JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY
卷 137, 期 2, 页码 213-218

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215121004758

关键词

Dysphagia; Inclusion Body Myositis; Deglutition Disorders; Neuromuscular Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed the symptoms, imaging, and management strategies of patients with inclusion body myositis referred for dysphagia assessment. The results showed that common symptoms included swallowing difficulties and reflux symptoms. Video swallow identified tongue base retraction and residual pharyngeal pooling as common problems. Some patients showed features of aspiration on imaging. Some patients received treatment with balloon dilatation or cricopharyngeal myotomy.
Objective This study reviewed patients with inclusion body myositis who were referred for assessment of dysphagia at a tertiary swallow clinic. It describes symptoms at presentation, imaging and management strategies. Method A retrospective review of electronic patient records was performed between 2016 and 2020. Results Twenty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 72 years. Baseline modified Sydney Swallow Questionnaires identified problems with hard or dry food, food sticking, and repeated swallowing. Twenty-two patients had a Reflux Symptom Index score that could indicate significant reflux. Video swallow identified specific problems, including tongue base retraction (96 per cent) and residual pharyngeal pooling (92 per cent). Seven patients (30 per cent) had features of aspiration on imaging despite a median penetration-aspiration scale score of 2. Four patients received balloon dilatation, and two patients underwent cricopharyngeal myotomy. Conclusion This study helped to profile features of dysphagia in patients with inclusion body myositis. More evidence is needed to determine the most effective management pathway for these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据