4.4 Article

Investigation of the properties of selected magnetorheological fluids

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X221077434

关键词

Magnetorheological fluids; intelligent materials; carbonyl iron; magnetite; magnetic field; fluid preparation

资金

  1. European Social Fund [POWR.03.02.00-00-I029/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents the research results on the rheological properties of magnetorheological fluids and the impact of different physical and chemical compositions. The study focused on the interaction between the base liquid and solid phase particles. The type of ferromagnetic particles was found to have a decisive impact on the magnetorheological response of the fluid.
The paper presents the results of research on the rheological properties of magnetorheological (MR) fluids with different physical and chemical compositions. The research concerned complete compositions of MR fluids as well as base fluids (samples containing no particles with ferromagnetic properties). Magnetorheological fluids consisted mainly of a carrier liquid in the form of glycerin or OKS 352 silicone oil, with magnetite or iron pentacarbonyl particles. The paper demon-strates the effect of the selection of individual components of the MR fluids on their rheological properties, paying attention to the interaction of the base liquid with the particles of the solid phase of the MR fluid. Under the conditions of exposure to a magnetic field, the type of ferromagnetic particles (their magnetic properties) have a decisive impact on the magnetorheological response of the fluid (change in rheological properties due to the effect of the magnetic field on the fluid). The magnetite-based samples showed a tangential stress of 1000 Pa, while the use of iron carbonyl allowed to obtain approximately 8000 Pa (with respect to the case where B = 500 mT, (gamma)over dot = 100 s(-1)). No significant differences in rheological properties were recorded between the oleic acid- and silica-stabilized samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据