4.7 Article

Digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling of a hybrid flow shop

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 2281-2306

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-01922-3

关键词

Dynamic scheduling; Predictive-reactive; Hybrid flow-shop; Digital twin; Flexibility; MILP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling approach for a real hybrid flow shop in a perfume manufacturing company, combining optimization and simulation to address the specific constraints of the case study.
Industries require, nowadays, to be more adaptable to unforeseen real-time events as well as to the rapid evolution of their market (e.g. multiplication of customers, increasingly personalized and unpredictable demand, etc.). To meet these challenges, manufacturers need new solutions to update their production plan when a change in the production system or its environment occurs. In this context, our research work deals with a dynamic scheduling problem of a real Hybrid Flow Shop considering the specific constraints of a perfume manufacturing company. This paper proposes a Digital Twin-driven dynamic scheduling approach based on the combination of both optimization and simulation. For the optimization, we have developed a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) scheduling model taking into account the main specific scheduling requirements of our case study. Regarding the simulation approach, a 3D shop floor model has been developed including the additional stochastic aspects and constraints which are difficult or impossible to model with a MILP approach. These two models are connected with the real shop floor to create a digital twin (DT). The developed DT allows the re-scheduling of production according to internal and external events. Finally, validation scenarios on a perfume case study have been designed and implemented in order to demonstrate the feasibility and the relevance of the proposed digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据