4.4 Article

Palletizing Robot Positioning Bolt Detection Based on Improved YOLO-V3

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01580-w

关键词

Palletizing robot; Positioning bolt; YOLO-V3; Densenet-4

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61733004, 62027810, 62076091, 62133005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved method for detecting positioning bolts (PB) by enhancing the dataset, designing an improved anchor box mechanism, and enhancing the feature extraction network. The method improves the detection accuracy and speed of PB data in palletizing robots.
To improve the detection accuracy and speed of palletizing robot positioning bolts in complex scenes, we proposed a positioning bolt (PB) detection method based on improved YOLO-V3. First, due to the actual detection requirement, we constructed the PB data set by using a series of data enhancement operations such as horizontal flip, +/- 30degree rotation, and random luminance enhancement or decrease. Then, an improved anchor box mechanism based on the k-means++ algorithm was designed to obtain a more accurate anchor box for the PB data. According to the feature of the PB data in the palletizing robot, such as the existence of dust and dirt on the surface, the feature extraction network was further enhanced by adding a Densenet-4 module. In this way, the low-level semantics and high-level abstract features can be extracted effectively to improve detection performance. Finally, a new bounding box regression loss function was elaborated to accelerate the neural network training. The experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed improvement mechanisms. The comparable results also show that our method is superior to the original YOLO-V3, SSD, and Faster R-CNN for PB data, and has a detection AP of 86.7%, a recall rate of 97%, and a detection speed of 25.47 FPS, which can achieve high-efficiency and high-precision detection in complex industrial scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据