4.7 Article

Influence of powder size on thermoelectric properties of p-type 25% Bi2Te3-75%Sb2Te3 alloys fabricated using gas-atomization and spark-plasma sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 686, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.340

关键词

Gas-atomization; Bismuth telluride; Spark plasma sintering; Thermoelectric materials; Grain boundaries

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2015R1D1A1A09060920]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [2011501010020]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130012589] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we report our work on large-scale production (2 kg/min) of BiSbTe alloy powders by gas atomization and spark-plasma sintering. We tried to optimize the fundamental transport parameters (carrier concentration, mobility, effective mass, and thermal conductivity) for improved thermoelectric performance of p-type Bi2Te3 by selecting different size ranges of powder particles. The Seebeck coefficient values were greatly enhanced (by 52%) due to increase in effective mass, and thermal conductivity was decreased (by 36%) using the <30 mu m powder spark-plasma sintered sample (compared with GA sample) due to phonon scattering at the grain boundary. However, the 32-75 mu m powder is preferable for attaining a high ZT value due to its high thermoelectric quality factor (beta). The highest ZT value obtained was 1.23 at 350 K for the 32-75 mu m powder bulk samples. This was an improvement of similar to 23% compared to the GA sample. The average ZT(av) of 1.15 in the temperature range 300-400 K, enables the alloy to be suitable for low temperature applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据