4.7 Article

PP2A interacts with KATANIN to promote microtubule organization and conical cell morphogenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 1514-1530

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13281

关键词

conical cells; cortical microtubules; KATANIN; phospho-regulation; protein phosphatase PP2A; morphogenesis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2018J01600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31822003, 31771344, 31500160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified PP2A as a regulator of conical cell shape and suggested that it mediates the phospho-regulation of KATANIN during plant cell morphogenesis.
The organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton is critical for cell and organ morphogenesis. The evolutionarily conserved microtubule-severing enzyme KATANIN plays critical roles in microtubule organization in the plant and animal kingdoms. We previously used conical cell of Arabidopsis thaliana petals as a model system to investigate cortical microtubule organization and cell morphogenesis and determined that KATANIN promotes the formation of circumferential cortical microtubule arrays in conical cells. Here, we demonstrate that the conserved protein phosphatase PP2A interacts with and dephosphorylates KATANIN to promote the formation of circumferential cortical microtubule arrays in conical cells. KATANIN undergoes cycles of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Using co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry, we identified PP2A subunits as KATANIN-interacting proteins. Further biochemical studies showed that PP2A interacts with and dephosphorylates KATANIN to stabilize its cellular abundance. Similar to the katanin mutant, mutants for genes encoding PP2A subunits showed disordered cortical microtubule arrays and defective conical cell shape. Taken together, these findings identify PP2A as a regulator of conical cell shape and suggest that PP2A mediates KATANIN phospho-regulation during plant cell morphogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据