4.2 Article

Current and future distributions of a native Andean bumble bee

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 559-569

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-022-00395-2

关键词

Conservation biogeography; Macroecology; Predictive models; Wallacean shortfall

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [304494/2019-4]
  2. US National Science Foundation [DBI-1057366]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change affects the distribution range of Bombus funebris in South America, causing it to retract and disperse to higher elevations. The loss of its crucial role in pollination in the Andes could have implications for insect conservation.
Climate change (CC) is expected to negatively impact global biodiversity and ecosystems, resulting in profound ecological impacts and placing complex networks of biological interactions at risk. Despite this worrying scenario, the existing knowledge deficiencies may be overcome with species distribution models (SDMs), providing estimates of the effects of CC upon biodiversity. We evaluate the impact of CC on the distribution of the bumble bee species Bombus (Funebribombus) funebris Smith, 1854 (Apidae: Bombini) in South America. The Andean region will remain suitable for B. funebris under models of future CC. Nonetheless, the distribution range size will decrease, especially in protected areas. We believe this is due to the elevation zones preferentially occupied by the bees. The existence and prevalence of the species may be affected by anthropic actions and CC. The growing use of SDMs is critical to minimizing information deficits related to insect species and providing estimates of their distribution ranges. Implications for insect conservation: Implications for insect conservation Our results show a retraction in the future distribution range of this bumble bee, dispersing to higher elevations. Therefore, it has the potential for the loss of plant-insect interactions by affecting its crucial role in Andean pollination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据