4.4 Article

Scaling up search engine audits: Practical insights for algorithm auditing

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/01655515221093029

关键词

Algorithm auditing; data collection; search engine audits; user modelling

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [491156185]
  2. SNF [100001CL_182630/1]
  3. DFG [MA 2244/9-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the challenges, methodological details, recommendations, lessons learned, and limitations of using virtual agents for algorithm audits. It demonstrates successful experiences in setting up experiments for different search engines and multiple data collections, highlighting changes and strategies to improve method quality.
Algorithm audits have increased in recent years due to a growing need to independently assess the performance of automatically curated services that process, filter and rank the large and dynamic amount of information available on the Internet. Among several methodologies to perform such audits, virtual agents stand out because they offer the ability to perform systematic experiments, simulating human behaviour without the associated costs of recruiting participants. Motivated by the importance of research transparency and replicability of results, this article focuses on the challenges of such an approach. It provides methodological details, recommendations, lessons learned and limitations based on our experience of setting up experiments for eight search engines (including main, news, image and video sections) with hundreds of virtual agents placed in different regions. We demonstrate the successful performance of our research infrastructure across multiple data collections, with diverse experimental designs, and point to different changes and strategies that improve the quality of the method. We conclude that virtual agents are a promising venue for monitoring the performance of algorithms across long periods of time, and we hope that this article can serve as a basis for further research in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据