4.5 Review

Assessing the tensile properties of interlayer hybrid thermoset-thermoplastic composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES
卷 51, 期 2_SUPPL, 页码 1754S-1777S

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15280837221104260

关键词

Hybrid; thermoplastic composite; thermoset composite; tensile properties; interlayer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The low toughness and brittle failure of fiber reinforced thermoset composites can be solved by interlayer hybridization with fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. The hybrid composites show improved tensile properties, including increased toughness and post-impact tensile properties.
Though fiber reinforced thermoset composites exhibit excellent rigidity and strength while being lightweight, they suffer from low toughness and brittle failure, which is unfavorable. On the other hand, fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites are good energy absorbers, damage resistant and recyclable; however, these materials exhibits insufficient rigidity. As a solution, the interlayer hybridization of glass fiber reinforced thermoset (GTS) and glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic (GTP) composites is proposed. This study aims at investigating the tensile properties of interlayer hybrid thermoset-thermoplastic composites. In this regard, two non-hybrid and two hybrid composite samples (GTS2-GTP and GTS4-GTP) were fabricated using common fabrication techniques: hand lay-up and hot compression molding. Both hybrid composite samples were fabricated in such a manner that GTP was sandwiched between two GTS plates. Based on the tensile test results, the failure strain of GTS sample was improved due to the interlayer hybridization with GTP. Non-hybrid composite samples exhibited one load drop in their tensile stress-strain behavior, while interlayer hybrid composites showed two load drops, which resulted in toughness increment. Moreover, hybrid thermoset-thermoplastic composites outperformed non-hybrid composites in terms of post-impact tensile properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据