4.7 Review

Laboratory evaluation to field application of ultrasound: A state-of-the-art review on the effect of ultrasonication on enhanced oil recovery mechanisms

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.03.030

关键词

Ultrasound; Mechanisms; Enhanced oil recovery; Laboratory and oilfield applications

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) , Malaysia [Q.J130000.3551.07G12, R.J130000.7851. 5F030, Q.J1300003551.06G68, R.J1300007351.4B545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a state-of-the-art review on the impact of ultrasound on enhanced oil recovery mechanisms. The study identifies ultrasound oil recovery mechanisms, elucidates the main factors affecting oil recovery, and clarifies the effects of ultrasound on enhanced oil recovery. The experimental and field results demonstrate significant improvement in oil recovery and its long-lasting effect.
Ultrasonic applications have proven to be successful in the laboratory and in the field. However, a review on the influence of ultrasound on enhanced oil recovery (EOR) mechanisms, is still lacking in the literature. Herein, the state-of-the-art review on the impact of ultrasound on EOR mechanisms is presented. Ultrasound oil recovery mechanisms were identified. Main factors affecting oil recovery mechanisms were elucidated. The effects of ultrasound on EOR mechanisms were clarified. Laboratory and field applications of ultrasound were reviewed. Lastly, hitches encountered in ultrasound EOR have opened new avenues for research and solutions proposed. Experimental findings demonstrate that oil recovery by ultrasound ranges from 5-82% original oil in place, with extra oil recovery occurring between 10-20 minutes of ultrasonication. Oilfield results indicate that oil production increased in the range of 26.5-91%, water cut decreased by 4-28%, the success rate was between 75-90%, and the effect can last for 3- 24 months. (c) 2022 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据