4.7 Article

Size-dependent photoluminescence dynamics of CuInS2 quantum dots and charge injection on titanium oxide film

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 658, 期 -, 页码 76-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.183

关键词

Size-dependent; Time-resolved photoluminescence; Low temperature photoluminescence; CuInS2 quantum dots; Charge injection rate

资金

  1. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFR50710]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51572205]
  3. Science and Technology Support Program of Hubei Province [2014BAA096]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2014CFB165]
  5. Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province [GD201402]
  6. [625010402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuInS2 quantum dots (QDs) with different sizes are synthesized by a solvothermal process, and then linked on the FTO conducting glass and TiO2 nanoparticle films. Photoluminescence (PL) lifetimes measured by time-resolved PL decay indicate that PL lifetimes firstly increase then decrease with the size increasing of CuInS2 quantum dots, which is due to the ratio between the radiative excitons traps and nonradiative excitons traps. Temperature-independent PL spectra of the 4.9 nm CuInS2 QDs prove that there is no emission peak shift from 5 K to 200 K, which is related with the emission from the trapped states, and the linear fitting character of the temperature dependence of the full width at half maximum comes from the coupling of the carriers to the acoustic phonons modes. With the CuInS2 quantum dots linking on TiO2 nanoparticle films, the PL lifetime is obviously reduced. The gradually larger conduction band energy offset between CuInS2 quantum dots and TiO2 induces the PL lifetime reducing with the size decreasing of the CuInS2 QDs, which can induce the faster electron injection rate constant for the CuInS2 quantum dots with small size. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据