4.5 Article

The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration: methodological clarifications of recent reports

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 847-852

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003107

关键词

antihypertensive drug; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; clinical trial; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is consistent epidemiological evidence that higher blood pressure increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, there is limited randomized evidence on the role of blood pressure level at treatment initiation. The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration provides a valuable resource for studying the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive therapy.
Epidemiological evidence has consistently shown that people with higher systolic or diastolic blood pressure are at greater risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, there has been limited randomized evidence to determine the role of blood pressure level at treatment initiation in the reduction of cardiovascular diseases risk. The extent to which other characteristics of individuals, such as prior disease history, age or sex, should be taken into account has also been controversial. Furthermore, effects on less commonly reported efficacy and safety outcomes remain underexplored. The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration has collected individual-level participant data from 52 randomized clinical trials, with more than 360 000 participants, and is now the largest source of individual-level data from randomized clinical trials of blood pressure-lowering treatment. This resource provides an unprecedented opportunity to address major areas of uncertainty relating to stratified efficacy and safety of antihypertensive therapy. Recent reports have demonstrated the power of pooled analyses of the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration dataset in filling long-standing gaps in our knowledge. However, there have been some misconceptions regarding the methods underpinning the recent reports, which we clarify in this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据