4.7 Article

Selective detection of dopamine based on Cu2O@ Pt core-shell nanoparticles modified electrode in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 689, 期 -, 页码 174-181

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.322

关键词

Cu2O@Pt core-shell nanoparticles; Non-enzymatic sensor; Dopamine; Ascorbic acid; Uric acid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China through a project entitled The synthesis of Pt-M/C nanoparticles and construction of non-enzymatic electrochemical biosensor [21205030]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51402096]
  3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Pollutant Analysis & Reuse Technology [PA160104]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) [2015-KF-13]
  5. Natural Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Hubei Province of China through a project entitled Controllable Synthesis and Application of Nano-/microsized Functional Materials [2014CFA015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cu2O@Pt nanoparticles were prepared by a two-step method, using Vulcan XC-72 carbon as support (donated as Cu2O@Pt/C). Transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to characterize the resulting Cu2O@Pt core-shell nanoparticles. The chemically modified electrode based on Cu2O@Pt/C nanocomposites was employed to eliminate the interference from ascorbic acid and uric acid for the sensitive and selective determination of dopamine. The electrochemical results indicate that the Cu2O@Pt/C nanocomposites show better electrocatalytic activity for the oxidation of dopamine than Pt/C nanocomposites with a linear range from 10 nM to 1027.16 mu M, a detection limit of 3 nM (S/N = 3) and sensitivity of 638.0 mu A mM(-1) cm(-2). Moreover, the sensor exhibits excellent long-time stability, good reproducibility and can be applied for practical application. (C) 2016 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据