4.5 Article

Attenuated alpha oscillation and hyperresponsiveness reveals impaired perceptual learning in migraineurs

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01410-2

关键词

Migraine; Pattern glare; Alpha; Hyperexcitability; Perceptual learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that migraineurs had lower alpha power before the onset of stimuli and higher alpha suppression after stimuli. These findings suggest the hyperresponsiveness of the visual cortex in migraine sufferers and may be related to dysfunction of the GABAergic inhibitory mechanism.
Background Anomalous phantom visual perceptions coupled to an aversion and discomfort to some visual patterns (especially grating in mid-range spatial frequency) have been associated with the hyperresponsiveness in migraine patients. Previous literature has found fluctuations of alpha oscillation (8-14 Hz) over the visual cortex to be associated with the gating of the visual stream. In the current study, we examined whether alpha activity was differentially modulated in migraineurs in anticipation of an upcoming stimulus as well as post-stimulus periods. Methods We used EEG to examine the brain activity in a group of 28 migraineurs (17 with aura /11 without) and 29 non-migraineurs and compared their alpha power in the pre/post-stimulus period relative to the onset of stripped gratings. Results Overall, we found that migraineurs had significantly less alpha power prior to the onset of the stimulus relative to controls. Moreover, migraineurs had significantly greater post-stimulus alpha suppression (i.e event-related desynchronization) induced by the grating in 3 cycles per degree at the 2nd half of the experiment. Conclusions These findings, taken together, provide strong support for the presence of the hyperresponsiveness of the visual cortex of migraine sufferers. We speculate that it could be the consequence of impaired perceptual learning driven by the dysfunction of GABAergic inhibitory mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据