4.7 Review

MIL series of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) as novel adsorbents for heavy metals in water: A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128271

关键词

Editor; < Dr; R; Maria Sonia > Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); Materials of Institute Lavoisier frameworks; (MILs); Heavy metals; Adsorption performance; Adsorption mechanisms; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1800603]
  2. National Natural Science Fund of China [41877182, 21637002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review systematically analyzes and summarizes recent progress in the synthesis and application of Materials of Institute Lavoisier frameworks (MILs) as effective adsorbents for the removal of aqueous heavy metal ions. The study includes a comparison of synthesis methods, an examination of adsorption performances, and a discussion on future directions.
With large specific surface area, abundant adsorption sites, flexible pore structure, and good water stability, Materials of Institute Lavoisier frameworks (MILs) have attracted increasing attention as effective environmental adsorbents. This review systematically analyzes and recapitulates recent progress in the synthesis and application of MIL-based adsorbents for the removal of aqueous heavy metal ions. Commonly used solvothermal, microwave, electrochemical, ultrasonic, and mechanochemical syntheses of MILs are first summarized and compared. Instead of focusing on adsorption process parameters, adsorption performances and governing mechanisms of virgin MILs, functional MILs, MIL-based composites, and carbonized MILs to representative metal(loid) ions (chromium, arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury) in water under various conditions are then systematically reviewed and discussed. In the end, this work also outlines prospects and future directions to promote the applications of MILs in treating heavy metal contaminated water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据