4.7 Review

Impact of fumigants on non-target soil microorganisms: a review

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128149

关键词

Soil fumigation; Fungicides, nematicides, microbial diversity; Bacteria

资金

  1. USDA National Insti-tute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project [7000945]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fumigant applications can decrease bacterial diversity and abundance, and alter bacterial community composition, but these effects are generally transient and tend to diminish or disappear after several weeks.
Fumigants have been used for decades to control soil-borne pathogens of high-value crops, and increasing evi-dence indicates they can affect non-target soil microbial communities. Understanding the impacts of these products on soil microorganisms is of critical importance not only for evaluating their environmental safety, but also because soil microbial communities have a central role in soil quality and nutrient cycling, plant growth, and crop production. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and metanalysis study of fumigant impacts on non-target soil microorganisms. In general, we found that fumigation decreases the bacterial diversity and abun-dance of total bacteria and nitrogen-cycling genes by approximately 10-50% during the first four weeks after application compared to non-treated soils. These decreases appear transient and tend to diminish or disappear after four weeks. Increases in bacterial diversity and abundance can occur after fumigation but are less common. Fumigant application can also alter bacterial community composition during the first six weeks after treatment by significantly increasing and/or decreasing the relative abundance of bacterial taxa involved in key soil functions such as N-cycling and plant-growth promotion. Knowledge gaps and areas where future research efforts should be prioritized to improve our understanding of the impact of organic fumigants on non-target soil mi-croorganisms are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据