4.7 Article

The ultrathin palladium nanosheets for sensitive and visual Hg2+ detection in the food chain

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128135

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2019YFC1605800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of mercury is important for assessing its toxicity and health risks. In this study, ultra-thin two-dimensional palladium nanosheets (PdNS) were synthesized for the simple, sensitive, accurate, and cheap detection of Hg2+. The PdNS showed high selectivity and sensitivity, and a detection kit was developed for Hg2+ detection using naked eye or cellphone at a low cost.
The detection of mercury, one of the ten most dangerous chemicals, is significant to provide helpful information for assessing mercury toxicity and health risks. However, it is a challenge to explore simple, sensitive, accurate, and cheap Hg2+ detection methods. Noble metal nanomaterials are used for Hg2+ detection by the colorimetric method widely. Still, the pure noble metal materials' detection limit of Hg2+ is high, and sensitivity enhancement usually requires further complex modification. Here, we use a facile one-step route to synthesize ultra-thin two-dimensional palladium nanosheets (PdNS), which have high selectivity and sensitivity for Hg2+ detection by colorimetric method with a low detection limit (0.55 ppb). The detection of Hg2+ by PdNS involves multiple mechanisms, including the formation of amalgam and PdO to improve the peroxidase-mimic activity of PdNS and PdNS motor function to increase its collision probability with the detection reactant. The PdNS can be used to detect Hg 2+ in various actual samples. The detection results are highly consistent with the data obtained by the atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS). Then, we developed a Hg2+ detection kit, which can realize simple, sensitive, and accurate Hg2+ detection by naked eye or cellphone at a meager cost (0.3 dollars each sample).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据