4.7 Article

An online technology for effectively monitoring inorganic condensable particulate matter emitted from industrial plants

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128221

关键词

Air pollutant control; Electrical conductivity; Stationary source; Online monitoring; Inorganic CPM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876028, T2122006, 41805091, 91743202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research team developed an online inorganic CPM monitoring system that accurately measures the mass concentrations of condensable particulate matter emitted from industrial plants. The system can also retrieve individual ion mass concentrations under steady operating conditions.
The concentration of condensable particulate matter (CPM) has gradually exceeded that of filterable particulate matter emitted from industrial plants equipped with advanced air pollution control systems. However, there is still no available online technology to measure CPM emissions. Based on the significant linear correlations (R2 0.87, p < 3 x 10-3) between the electrical conductivity (EC) values and ionic mass concentrations of the CPM solutions when the interference of H+ was excluded. We developed an online inorganic CPM monitoring system, including a cooling and condensation unit, pH and EC meters, a self-cleaning unit, and an automatic control unit. The CPM mass concentrations obtained by the developed online monitoring system agree well (mean bias 3.8-20.7%) with those obtained by the offline system according to USEPA Method 202 when used in parallel during real-world studies. Furthermore, individual ion mass concentrations of CPMs can even be retrieved separately with a time resolution of one hour when industrial plants are under steady operating conditions. The newly developed system makes the online monitoring of CPM emissions available and lays a foundation for the control of CPM emitted from industrial sources to further improve air quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据