4.5 Article

Co-rotating extrusion cooking impact on product characteristics using hulled kodo millet and hybrid maize flour

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 59, 期 11, 页码 4165-4175

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-022-05467-4

关键词

Vitamin A deficiency; Expansion index; Browning index; Kodo millet; Hybrid maize; Extrusion

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the processing loss and product characteristics of a combination of hulled Kodo millet and biofortified CO6 maize in specific process conditions, providing a scientific basis for producing healthier and more acceptable breakfast cereals.
Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is adamant in developing countries especially affecting pregnant women and children. Popular maize hybrid (CO6) contains higher beta-carotene concentration (923 mu g/100 g), is considered one of the prominent and cheapest sources of provitamin A for humans, to alleviate VAD. The present research explored an adequate combination of hulled Kodo millet, a valuable food source for diabetics with limiting carotenoid content (0.17 mu g/100 g) and biofortified hybrid maize genotypes (CO6) in ratio 70:30. Studies on process loss of total carotenoids (273.17-388.65 mu g/100 g) without affecting the expansion index (2.06-4.46), piece density (254.06-585.62 kgm(-3)), browning index (47.25-88.38%), and hardness (13.21-67.59 N) characteristics under the influence of feed moisture 12.5-17.5%, wet basis, die temperature 150-180 degrees C and screw speed 420-470 rpm was evaluated in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder, following a five-level three-factor central composite rotatable design. The investigated physical and total carotenoid contents alteration upon extrusion cooking will add a scientific knowledge base to produce healthier breakfast cereals with acceptable technological and nutritional characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据