4.7 Article

Potential vorticity fronts and the late-time evolution of large-scale quasi-geostrophic flows

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 939, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.194

关键词

geostrophic turbulence; quasi-geostrophic flows; shallow water flows

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the late-time behavior of freely evolving quasi-geostrophic flows, showing that the flows are dominated by large multi-level vortices with well-mixed potential vorticity in the late stages. Different initial conditions result in varying numbers of mixed potential vorticity levels, but ultimately inverse cascades of potential energy emerge.
The late-time behaviour of freely evolving quasi-geostrophic flows with initial characteristic length scale L-0 larger than or equal to the deformation radius L-D, L-0/L-D >= 1, is studied. At late time the flows are dominated by large multi-level vortices consisting of ascending terraces of well-mixed potential vorticity (PV), i.e. PV staircases. We examine how the number of mixed PV levels depends on the initial conditions, in particular Lo/LD. For sufficiently large values of L-0/L-D approximate to 5, a complete staircase with regular steps forms, but as L-0/L-D decreases, the staircase becomes more irregular, with fewer mixed levels and the appearance of a large step centred on zero PV, corresponding to large regions of near-zero PV separating the multi-level vortices. This occurs because weak PV features in the initial field with scales smaller than L-D undergo filamentation and are coarse-grained away or homogenised. For all values of L-0/L-D considered, inverse cascades of potential energy commence at sufficiently late times. The onset of these cascades, even when the flow is initialised well within the 'asymptotic model' (AM) regime, suggests that the AM regime is not self-consistent: when potential vorticity fronts are well-resolved, frontal dynamics eventually drive ongoing flow evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据