4.7 Article

Immersed body motion: near-bottom added mass effects

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 939, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.143

关键词

turbulent boundary layers; computational methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper defines a novel model to evaluate the near-bottom effects of added mass and investigates the instantaneous pressure field due to body movement. The study reveals strong body accelerations measured in laboratory experiments that have not been evidenced in previous theoretical studies.
The presence of a solid boundary can cause a substantial increase in added mass due to a solid body movement in the fluid. If the body is very close to the boundary, the added mass increases at an even greater rate. The added mass can be of considerable importance in many dams and hydropower, water/ocean, civil and mechanical engineering problems; furthermore, it has an important effect on the dynamics of the vibrating body in the fluid. The principal aim of this paper is to define a novel model to properly evaluate the near-bottom effects of the added mass and to investigate the instantaneous pressure field due to a body movement that changes the thickness of a compressible thin fluid film close to a solid boundary. The body movement can be due to the application of an external force according to Newton's law. This phenomenon is studied theoretically in this paper, and a hydrodynamic model able to compute the instantaneous pressure field in the thin fluid film is drawn out. The fluid film thickness variation, producing compression and decompression waves, tends to reduce the mean body displacement due to external forces, but it generates both high-frequency fluctuations in body force and in body displacements. For the first time, this novel study provides the near-bottom added mass and justifies the strong body accelerations measured in the laboratory experiments that have not been evidenced in the theoretical studies in the known literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据