4.5 Article

Establishment and evaluation of qPCR and real-time recombinase-aided amplification assays for detection of largemouth bass ranavirus

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 1033-1043

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13627

关键词

largemouth bass ranavirus; qPCR; recombinase aided amplification; sensitivity; specificity

资金

  1. Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams [2021KJ119]
  2. Guangxi project of key research and development (GuikeAB) [21220017]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Science Foundation Project [32160873]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MC036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A qPCR and real-time RAA assay were established for the detection of LMBV, with qPCR more suitable for quantitative analysis in the laboratory and real-time RAA more suitable as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for on-site detection and screening of LMBV under farm conditions.
Largemouth bass ranavirus disease (LMBVD) caused by largemouth bass ranavirus (LMBV) has resulted in severe economic losses in the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) farming industry in China. Early and accurate diagnosis is the key measure for the prevention and control of LMBVD. In this study, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and a real-time recombinase-aided amplification (real-time RAA) assay were established for the detection of LMBV. The sensitivity and specificity of these two methods, and the efficacy for detection of LMBV from clinical samples were also evaluated. Results showed that the real-time RAA reaction was completed in <30 min at 39celcius with a detection limit of 58.3 copies, while qPCR reaction required 60 min with a detection limit of 5.8 copies. Both methods were specific for LMBV, where no cross-reactions observed with the other tested fish pathogens. Comparing the amplification results of both assays to the results obtained by virus isolation using 53 clinical tissue samples, results showed that the clinical sensitivity of real-time RAA and qPCR were 93.75% and 100% respectively, and the clinical specificity of both were 100%. Our results showed that qPCR is more suitable for quantitative analysis and accurate detection of LMBV in the laboratory, while real-time RAA is more suitable as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for on-site detection and screening of LMBV under farm conditions and in poorly equipped laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据