4.7 Article

Low material density and high microwave-absorption performance of hollow strontium ferrite nanofibers prepared via coaxial electrospinning

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 687, 期 -, 页码 541-547

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.118

关键词

Coaxial electrospinning; Hollow structures; Magnetization; Reflection loss

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21275016, 21575011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YS1406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19: SrM) nanofibers have been successfully synthesized by coaxial electrospinning with the advantages of low material density and high microwave absorption performance. SrM precursors were used for coaxial electrospinning and annealing at different temperatures (600 degrees C, 650 degrees C, 700 degrees C, and 750 degrees C). A variety of characterization methods-XRD, TG, SEM, TEM, EDS, VSM and VNA-are used to analyze their particle size, morphology, magnetic response and absorption performance. The outer and inner diameters of hollow nanofibers annealed at 750 degrees C are 28 and 16 nm, respectively. The hollow structure is clearly visible, and as per calculation results, the material density is nearly 48.5% lower than that of solid fibers with the same diameter. The magnetism properties improve with increasing nanoparticle sizes for the single-domain particles. The saturation magnetization and the coercivity of the hollow nanofibers at 750 degrees C are 57.8 A m(2) kg(-1) and 333.9 kA m(-1), respectively. When the thickness of the absorber coating was 3.4 mm, the electromagnetic radiation reflection loss reached -12.69 dB at 11.68 GHz. The calculated reflection loss of the hollow sample is better than that of solid fibers; the maximum ratio of structure reduction is 14.5%. Further, the mechanism of SrM formation and the mechanism of the improvement of the microwave absorption properties are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据