4.6 Article

6-Amino-2,4,5-trimethylpyridin-3-ol and 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-5-ol derivatives as selective fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 inhibitors: design, synthesis, molecular docking, and anti-hepatocellular carcinoma efficacy evaluation

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2048378

关键词

Aminotrimethylpyri(mi)dinol; FGFR4 kinase; molecular docking; hepatocellular carcinoma; anti-tumour

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) [NRF-2018R1A2B6001299, NRF-2020R1A2C2005690]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel compounds were designed and synthesized as FGFR4 inhibitors. Their inhibitory activity on FGFR4 was elucidated through molecular docking and their anti-cancer activity was evaluated in cell lines and animal models. Compound 60 showed high selectivity and strong anti-proliferative activity against Hep3B, indicating its potential therapeutic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma.
A novel series of aminotrimethylpyridinol and aminodimethylpyrimidinol derivatives were designed and synthesised for FGFR4 inhibitors. Structure-activity relationship on the FGFR4 inhibitory activity of the new compounds was dearly elucidated by an intensive molecular docking study. Anti-cancer activity of the compounds was evaluated using hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines and a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) tumour model. Compound 60 showed FGFR4 inhibitory activity over FGFR1 3. Compared to the positive control BLU9931, compound 60 exhibited at least 8 times higher FGFR4 selectivity. Strong antiproliferative activity of compound 60 was observed against Hep3B, an HCC cell line which was a much more sensitive cell line to BLU9931. In vivo anti-tumour activity of compound 60 against Hep3B-xenografted CAM tumour model was almost similar to BLU9931. Overall, compound 60, a novel derivative of aminodimethyl-pyrimidinol, was a selective FGFR4 kinase inhibitor blocking HCC tumour growth. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据