4.7 Article

Stakeholder engagement to inform the risk assessment and governance of gene drive technology to manage spotted-wing drosophila

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114480

关键词

Stakeholder engagement; Risk assessment; Spotted-wing drosophila; Gene drive technology; Invasive species; Genetic biocontrol; Governance

资金

  1. USDA APHIS [AP17PPQS&T00C16/17-8130-0194-CA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a survey of 184 stakeholders to explore their views on the potential benefits and adverse effects of gene drive technology for managing spotted-wing drosophila. The results reveal that stakeholders prioritize decreases in pesticide use and spotted-wing drosophila populations as the most important benefits, while expressing concerns about potential decreases in beneficial insects, increases in secondary pest infestations, and grower profits. It emphasizes the need to move beyond simplistic views of support or opposition to the technology and consider the factors that influence stakeholder decision making.
Emerging biotechnologies, such as gene drive technology, are increasingly being proposed to manage a variety of pests and invasive species. As one method of genetic biocontrol, gene drive technology is currently being developed to manage the invasive agricultural pest spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii, SWD). While there have been calls for stakeholder engagement on gene drive technology, there has been a lack of empirical work, especially concerning stakeholder engagement to inform risk assessment. To help address this gap and inform future risk assessments and governance decisions for SWD gene drive technology, we conducted a survey of 184 SWD stakeholders to explore how they define and prioritize potential benefits and potential adverse effects from proposed SWD gene drive technology. We found that stakeholders considered the most important potential benefits of SWD gene drive technology to be: 1) Decrease in the quantity or toxicity of pesticides used, and 2) Decrease in SWD populations. Stakeholders were most concerned about the potential adverse effects of: 1) Decrease in beneficial insects, 2) Increase in non-SWD secondary pest infestations, and 3) Decrease in grower profits. Notably, we found that even stakeholders who expressed support for the use of SWD gene drive technology expressed concerns about potential adverse effects from the technology, emphasizing the need to move past simplistic, dichotomous views of what it means to support or oppose a technology. These findings suggest that instead of focusing on the binary question of whether stakeholders support or oppose SWD gene drive technology, it is more important to identify and assess the factors that are consequential to stakeholder decision making - including, for example, exploring whether and under what conditions key potential adverse effects and potential benefits would result from the use of SWD gene drive technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据