4.7 Article

Implication of imposing fertilizer limitations on energy, agriculture, and land systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 305, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114391

关键词

Fertilizer limitation; Global change analysis model; Land use change; Agricultural production

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, as part of research in the MultiSector Dynamics, Earth and Environmental System Modeling program
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-1739823]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the 1950's, global fertilizer usage has increased by more than 800%, resulting in detrimental impacts to the environment. Studies have found that reducing global fertilizer usage may lead to decreased global cropland area, expanded forested area, and impacts on agricultural commodity price, production, and energy production.
Since the 1950's, global fertilizer usage has increased by more than 800% resulting in detrimental impacts to the environment. The projected increase in crop production due to increasing demands for food, feed, biofuel, and other uses, may further increase fertilizer usage. Studies have examined achieving agricultural intensification in environmentally sustainable ways, however, they have not focused on the whole-system economic aspects of changes in fertilizer usage over the long term. We utilize the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) to explore the impact of reducing global fertilizer usage on land use change, agricultural commodity price and production, energy production, and greenhouse gas emissions. We find that constrained fertilizer availability results in reduced global cropland area, particularly land used for bioenergy production, and expanded forested area. These results are driven by price impacts which lead to shifts in agricultural production between commodity types, regions, and technologies, and which lead to decreased agricultural commodity demands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据