4.7 Article

International Consensus on Allergen Immunotherapy II: Mechanisms, standardization, and pharmacoeconomics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 137, 期 2, 页码 358-368

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1300

关键词

International consensus; allergy; immunotherapy; allergen vaccine; allergen standardization; pharmacoeconomics; cost-effectiveness; mechanisms; tolerance; marketing authorization; regulatory authorities; unmet needs

资金

  1. Anergis
  2. Allergopharma
  3. GLG Research (Gerson Lehrman Group)
  4. ActoGeniX
  5. Genentech
  6. Sanofi US Services
  7. Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America
  8. ALK-Abello
  9. Stallergenes
  10. Merck
  11. Greer
  12. Circassia
  13. Stallergenes-Greer
  14. DBV
  15. Thermo Fisher Scientific
  16. Chiesi
  17. Pierre Fabre Medicament
  18. Menarini
  19. MSD
  20. AstraZeneca
  21. NIHR (UK)
  22. MEDA
  23. Pfizer
  24. MIT
  25. BI
  26. Novartis Glenmark
  27. Novartis
  28. UCB
  29. GlaxoSmithKline
  30. Astra Zeneca
  31. Senosiain
  32. Sanofi
  33. TEVA
  34. Carnot
  35. Glenmark
  36. Mylan
  37. Pharma Dynamics
  38. INNOVA Pharma
  39. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  40. Thermo Fisher
  41. GlaxoSmithKline/Aspen
  42. Cipla
  43. Astellas
  44. Beiersdorf
  45. Takeda Nycomed
  46. Pearl Therapeutics
  47. Allergopharma (Germany)
  48. ALK-Abello (Denmark)
  49. Stallergenes (France)
  50. HAL-Allergy (Netherlands)
  51. Artu Biologicals (Netherlands)
  52. Allergy Therapeutics/Bencard (United Kingdom/Germany)
  53. Hartington (Spain)
  54. Lofarma (Italy)
  55. Novartis/Leti (Germany/Spain)
  56. GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
  57. Essex-Pharma (Germany)
  58. Cytos (Switzerland)
  59. Curalogic (Denmark)
  60. Roxall (Germany)
  61. Biomay (Austria)
  62. Thermo Fisher (United States)
  63. Circassia (United Kingdom)
  64. E.U
  65. Biotech Tools (Belgium)
  66. MEDA-Pharma (Sweden)
  67. Anergis (Switzerland)
  68. Bencard (Germany)
  69. Novartis/LETI (Germany)
  70. MEDA-Pharma (Germany)
  71. GfK Bridgehead (United Kingdom)
  72. NAVIGANT-consulting (United States)
  73. Sanofi (United States)
  74. Guide-point Global Advisors (United States)
  75. Pohl-Boskamp (Germany)
  76. Mobile Chamber Experts (a GA2LEN partner, Germany)
  77. HAL-Allergy (Germany/Netherlands)
  78. GlaxoSmithKline (Germany)
  79. Thermo-Fisher (Germany)
  80. Schattauer (Germany)
  81. Springer (Germany)
  82. European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI)
  83. German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI)
  84. German Respiratory Society (DGP)
  85. European Commission
  86. Scientific Advisory Board Chair for HAL Allergy BV
  87. Bayer CropScience
  88. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [NO1-AI-15416, UM1AI109565]
  89. Food Allergy and Research Education (FARE)
  90. UK Department of Health through NIHR
  91. HAL
  92. Crucell
  93. Emerade
  94. NOW
  95. STW
  96. Biomay
  97. Actelion
  98. Aventis
  99. Circacia
  100. PREDICTA (European Commission's Seventh Framework programme) [260895]
  101. Swiss National Science Foundation
  102. MeDALL (European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme) [261357]
  103. Christine Kuhne-Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article continues the comprehensive international consensus (ICON) statement on allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The initial article also recently appeared in the Journal. The conclusions below focus on key mechanisms of AIT-triggered tolerance, requirements in allergen standardization, AIT cost-effectiveness, and regulatory guidance. Potential barriers to and facilitators of the use of AIT are described in addition to future directions. International allergy specialists representing the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the World Allergy Organization critically reviewed the existing literature and prepared this summary of recommendations for best AIT practice. The authors contributed equally and reached consensus on the statements presented herein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据