4.7 Article

Pore-network modeling of Ostwald ripening in porous media: How do trapped bubbles equilibrate?

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 457, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111041

关键词

Porous media; Ostwald ripening; Pore network; Equilibrium; Trapping; CO2 storage

资金

  1. Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering (EME)
  2. College of Earth and Mineral Sciences (EMS)
  3. Institute for Computational and Data Sciences at Penn State University
  4. CNPC Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the Ostwald ripening of trapped bubbles in porous media, which is relevant to subsurface and manufacturing applications. Through simulations and theoretical analysis, the article reveals the evolution process of the bubble size distribution from initially non-uniform to stable equilibrium, and finds that the equilibration of bubbles in heterogeneous porous media is slower than in homogeneous media.
Ostwald ripening of trapped bubbles in porous media is relevant to several subsurface (e.g., CO2 storage) and manufacturing (e.g., fuel cells) applications. A fundamental question common to both is: how does an initially heterogeneous distribution of bubble sizes, PDFo, evolves towards a stable equilibrium distribution, PDFe? And what is PDFe? We develop a pore-network model (PNM) that simulates the temporal evolution of a partially miscible population of bubbles from PDFo to PDFe. The PNM is validated against published micromodel experiments. We subsequently propose a theory that can predict PDFe directly. The predictions are compared against PNM simulations and found to be in close agreement. Using the PNM, we also show that bubble equilibration in heterogeneous porous media is a lot slower than homogeneous media. Limitations and potential extensions of both the PNM and the theory are discussed. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据