4.6 Article

Psychological risk indicators for peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 980-987

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13645

关键词

bruxism; dental implants; peri-implantitis; psychological distress; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between peri-implantitis and psychological distress, as well as potential related/mediating factors. The results showed that depressive symptoms were significantly associated with peri-implantitis.
Aim The aim of this analytical cross-sectional study was to evaluate the association between peri-implantitis and psychological distress, and potentially related/mediating factors such as general health, bruxism, and lifestyle factors. Materials and Methods Patients who received dental implants at a private practice in the Netherlands between January 2011 and January 2014 were recalled on a 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up examination. Presence of peri-implantitis was examined, and patients completed questionnaires measuring psychological distress (Symptom Checklist [SCL]-90), bruxism, general health, and lifestyle factors. Associations between the self-reported factors and peri-implantitis were analysed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results A total of 230 patients (with 347 implants) were included in the analysis. Prevalence of (mild to severe) peri-implantitis was 30% (69 patients). Variables that showed a significant univariable association with peri-implantitis (p < .10) were the SCL-90 subdomain depression, smoking, current medical treatment, and lung problems. In the multivariate regression analysis, depression was the only variable that was significantly associated with peri-implantitis (p < .05). Conclusions The presence of depressive symptoms is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis. Recognizing the potential negative impact of depressive symptoms may allow for better identification of high-risk patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据