4.4 Review

Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 E283-E292

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001680

关键词

endosonography; fine-needle biopsy; subepithelial; gastrointestinal; diagnosis

资金

  1. Research Incubation Project of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University [KY08025]
  2. Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project of Yuzhong District of Chongqing [20190107]
  3. Chongqing Talent Plan [cstc2021ycjhbgzxm0077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of EUS-FNB in diagnosing GI SELs, and concluded that EUS-FNB has relatively high diagnostic yield, technical success, and security.
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has become an efficient method for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs). However, recent guidelines have not regarded FNB as the primary strategy for diagnosing GI SELs. We performed this study to systematically measure the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of EUS-FNB in diagnosing GI SELs. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed and EMBASE and published after January 2015 were included. The overall rates of diagnostic yield, technical success, and adverse events were calculated as outcome measures. The Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to evaluate the quality of the trials, funnel plots and Egger's test were used to measure publication bias, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the variance of heterogeneity and sensitivity, respectively. Results: Sixteen studies analyzing 969 patients between 2015 and 2020 were included. Studies showed little change in sensitivity, and 13 were considered high quality. A certain degree of publication bias existed in the diagnostic accuracy rate. The overall rates of diagnostic yield, technical success, and adverse events were [85.69% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.73-88.22, I (2)=41.8%), 98.83% (95% CI: 96.73-99.97, I (2)=54.3%), and 1.26% (95% CI: 0.35-2.54, I (2)=0.0%)]. No clinical influencing factors were identified in the subgroup analysis. Conclusions: EUS-FNB is a promising technology with a relatively superior diagnostic yield, technical success, and security, which is an optimal option for the diagnosis of SELs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据