相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty EVALUATION OF THE OXFORD KNEE SCORE USING A UK NATIONAL PROMS DATASET
S. A. Sabah et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2021)
Trajectories of pain and function in the first five years after total hip and knee arthroplasty AN ANALYSIS OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME DATA FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY
J. R. Dainty et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2021)
cutpointr: Improved Estimation and Validation of Optimal Cutpoints in R
Christian Thiele et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2021)
JointCalc: A web-based personalised patient decision support tool for joint replacement
Evgeny Zotov et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS (2020)
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial
David J. Beard et al.
LANCET (2019)
The minimal clinically important difference re-considered
J. Dekker
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2019)
Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Minimal Detectable Change
Caroline B. Terwee
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2019)
Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement
Lina H. Ingelsrud et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2018)
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
C. A. C. Prinsen et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty
Kristina Harris et al.
PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES (2016)
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery
David J. Beard et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different knee prostheses: the Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT)
[Anonymous]
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2014)
Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients
Michael M. Ward et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
Kristina Harris et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2013)
An exploratory and confirmatory analysis of the oxford hip score: generation of subscales assessing self-reported function and pain
Kristina Harris et al.
Trials (2013)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus
J. Dawson et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2007)
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
分享论文
