4.7 Article

Does Model Calibration Reduce Uncertainty in Climate Projections?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 2585-2602

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0434.1

关键词

Inverse methods; Optimization; Climate models; General circulation models; Model comparison; Parameterization

资金

  1. NERC [OptClim: NE/L012146/1]
  2. U.K.-China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund - National Centre for Atmospheric Science
  3. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Industrially Focused Mathematical Modelling [EP/L015803/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is large uncertainty in climate projections, which could arise from unresolved processes, parameter values, or model calibration targets. However, by systematically calibrating the models, the uncertainties in equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response can be reduced. The uncertainties in surface temperature, precipitation, and annual extremes are relatively small, and residual uncertainty mainly comes from unconstrained sea ice feedbacks. The choice of parameterization schemes for unresolved processes is a significant contributor to the uncertainty in climate projections.
Uncertainty in climate projections is large as shown by the likely uncertainty ranges in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 2.5-4 K and in the transient climate response (TCR) of 1.4-2.2 K. Uncertainty in model projections could arise from the way in which unresolved processes are represented, the parameter values used, or the targets for model calibration. We show that, in two climate model ensembles that were objectively calibrated to minimize differences from observed large-scale atmospheric climatology, uncertainties in ECS and TCR are about 2-6 times smaller than in the CMIP5 or CMIP6 multimodel ensemble. We also find that projected uncertainties in surface temperature, precipitation, and annual extremes are relatively small. Residual uncertainty largely arises from unconstrained sea ice feedbacks. The more than 20-year-old HadAM3 standard model configuration simulates observed hemispheric-scale observations and pre-industrial surface temperatures about as well as the median CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles while the optimized configurations simulate these better than almost all the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Hemispheric-scale observations and preindustrial temperatures are not systematically better simulated in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 although the CMIP6 ensemble seems to better simulate patterns of large-scale observations than the CMIP5 ensemble and the optimized HadAM3 configurations. Our results suggest that most CMIP models could be improved in their simulation of large-scale observations by systematic calibration. However, the uncertainty in climate projections (for a given scenario) likely largely arises from the choice of parameterization schemes for unresolved processes (structural uncertainty), with different tuning targets another possible contributor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据