4.7 Article

Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water and nitrogen use, and greenhouse gas emissions in rice paddy fields

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131487

关键词

total irrigation water; Water productivity; Grain yield; Nitrogen use efficiency; CH4 andN(2)O emissions; Optimal water management

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42177365, 51809226, 51909229]
  2. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF) [CX (21) 3071]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation is a reliable and widespread water-saving technology for rice production. This review comprehensively assesses the effects of AWD on water use, yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also explores the optimal AWD water thresholds. The study finds that the difference between continuous flooding (CF) and AWD thresholds, as well as soil types, significantly impact water use, yield, and NUE. Additionally, CF thresholds and fertilizer-N rates are key indicators affecting GHG emissions. Optimization models are established to determine the optimal AWD water thresholds for different soil types. Case analysis shows that adopting the optimal AWD water management can achieve water savings and increased water productivity without compromising yield, NUE, and GHG emissions.
Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation is a reliable and widespread water-saving technology for rice production. This review aimed to comprehensively assess the changes in water use, yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions after AWD adoption and explore the optimal AWD water thresholds. Based on abundant data obtained from contrasting experiments between AWD and continuous flooding (CF) irrigation, the effects of AWD were quantified by stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR). The quantitative indices are the changes in total irrigation water (dIW), water productivity (delta WP), grain yields (delta GY), NUE indices, global warming potential (delta GWP), and yield-scaled global warming potential (delta YGWP) between AWD and CF. It was found that the delta(C-A) (i.e. the difference between the CF and AWD thresholds) and soil types were the most noteworthy indicators affecting IW, water productivity, yield and partial factor productivity of N (PFPN). Meanwhile, the delta(C-A) and fertilizer-N rates (NR) were two key indicators affecting GHG emissions. Thereafter, for different soil types, a group of optimization models were established to explore the optimal AWD water thresholds for optimizing delta IW and delta WP simultaneously without yield, NUE, and GHG emissions penalties. The results showed that the optimal upper limit of AWD (U-AWD) should be equal to the upper limit of the CF (U-CF), and the optimal lower limit of AWD (L-AWD) can be obtained by the model. Taking the clay paddy field as an example, the min delta IW were-41% to-8%, and the max delta WP were 11%-54% after adopting optimal AWD water managements. The corresponding delta GY, delta PFPN, delta GWP, delta YGWP were 0%-1%, 0%-1%,-66% to-15% and-52% to-12%, respectively. This review provides a novel way to estimate the performance of AWD and provide guidance for proper AWD water management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据