4.7 Article

An efficient and clean method for the selective separation of arsenic from scrap copper anode slime containing high arsenic and tin

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131640

关键词

Scrap copper anode slime; Arsenic; Selective separation; Oxygen-enriched roasting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective method for selectively separating arsenic from scrap copper anode slime using oxygen-enriched roasting and acid leaching has been proposed. This method restricts the volatilization of arsenic and allows for the extraction of selective leachable compounds.
As the different properties of conventional copper anode slime and scrap copper anode slime (SCAS), the disposal of arsenic before the extraction process is very important. There was simultaneous leaching of As and Sn when the hydrometallurgical process or the sulfation roasting-leaching was applied to treat arsenic in the SCAS. It was difficult to achieve the effective separation of arsenic and tin by these methods. Therefore, an effective and clean pretreatment method for selectively separating arsenic from scrap copper anode slime containing high arsenic and tin via oxygen-enriched roasting followed by acid leaching was proposed. The volatilization rate of arsenic was only 1.13% under the optimum oxygen-enriched roasting parameters. The results of acid leaching showed that the leaching efficiencies of Cu and As were above 97%, and the elements of Sn, Pb, and Ag were enriched in the leaching residue. It is a promising method which can not only obtain selective leachable compounds (such as insoluble SnO2) but also restrict the volatilization of arsenic by forming (MeO)x(As2O5)y or As2O5 to solve the problem of easy dispersion of arsenic, both of which were good for sulfuric acid leaching. Meanwhile, there was no need to develop a new process for treating the leachate, which can be directly sent to the electrolyte purification process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据