4.7 Article

Universality of the Forster's model for resonant exciton transfer in ensembles of nanocrystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 156, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0085355

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [0729-2020-0058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For nanocrystals in a strong quantum confinement regime, resonant exciton transfer is confirmed to follow the Forster mechanism with the governing role of dipole-dipole interaction. The contributions from higher-order multipoles are negligibly small even in dense ensembles. By computing the rate of resonant exciton transfer and estimating the total rate of exciton non-radiative annihilation, the dependence of the total rate on the nanocrystal size is determined by the size distribution function of nanocrystals in the ensemble.
For nanocrystals in a strong quantum confinement regime, it has been confirmed analytically that resonant exciton transfer proceeds in full accordance with the Forster mechanism. This means that the virtual exciton transitions between the nanocrystals of close sizes are governed only by the dipole-dipole interaction of nanocrystals even in very dense ensembles, while the contributions of all other higher-order multipoles are negligibly small. Based on a simple isotropic model of the envelope function approximation and neglecting the electron-hole interaction inside each nanocrystal, we have computed the rate of the resonant exciton transfer between two nanocrystals. Using the obtained result, we have estimated, for some arbitrarily chosen nanocrystal, the total rate of the exciton non-radiative annihilation caused by the possibility of its resonant virtual transitions into all other nanocrystals of the ensemble. The total rate dependence on the nanocrystal size is determined only by the size distribution function of nanocrystals in the ensemble. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据